Hearken, O Mādhava, what more can I say?
Nought can I find to compare with love:

Though the sun of the East should rise in the West,
Yet would not love be far from the worthy,

Or if I should write the stars of heaven on earth,
Or if I could pour from my hands the water of all the sea.

-- Vidyapati

I feel my body vanishing into the dust whereon my beloved walks.

I feel one with the water of the lake where he bathes.

Oh friend, my love crosses death's boundary when I meet him.

My heart melts in the light and merges in the mirror whereby he views his
face.

I move with the air to kiss him when he waves his fan, and wherever he
wanders I enclose him like the sky.

Govindadas says, “You are the gold-setting, fair maiden, he is the
emerald”

Among the hills, when you sit in the cool shade of the white poplars, sharing the peace and serenity of distant fields and meadows – then let your heart say in silence, “God rests in reason.”
And when the storm comes, and the mighty wind shakes the forest, and thunder and lightning proclaim the majesty of the sky, – then let your heart say in awe, “God moves in passion.”
And since you are a breath in God’s sphere, and a leaf in God’s forest, you too should rest in reason and move in passion
.

-- Kahlil Gibran, The Prophet

Open your eyes ...

Open your eyes ...

Mirror-pond of stars …

Suddenly a summer

shower

Dimples the water.

-- Sesshi

He who has been instructed thus far in the things of love, and who has learned to see the beautiful in due order and succession, when he comes toward the end will suddenly perceive a nature of wondrous beauty(and this, Socrates, is the final cause of all our former toils)—a nature which in the first place is everlasting, not growing and decaying, or waxing and waning; secondly, not fair in one point of view and foul in another, or at one time or in one relation or at one place fair, at another time or in another relation or at another place foul, as if fair to some and foul to others, or in the likeness of a face or hands or any other part of the bodily frame, or in any form of speech or knowledge, or existing in any other being, as for example, in an animal, or in heaven, or in earth, or in any other place; but beauty absolute, separate, simple, and everlasting, which without diminution and without increase, or any change, is imparted to the ever-growing and perishing beauties of all other things. He who from these ascending under the influence of true love, begins to perceive that beauty, is not far from the end. And the true order of going, or being led by another, to the things of love, is to begin from the beauties of earth and mount upwards for the sake of that other beauty, using these as steps only, and from one going on to two, and from two to all fair forms, and from fair forms to fair practices, and from fair practices to fair notions, until from fair notions he arrives at the notion of absolute beauty, and at last knows what the essence of beauty is.

“This, my dear Socrates”, said the stranger of Mantineia, “is that life above all others which man should live, in the contemplation of beauty absolute.... But what if man had eyes to see the true beauty—the divine beauty, I mean, pure and clear and unalloyed, not clogged with the pollutions of mortality and all the colours and vanities of human life—thither looking, and holding converse with the true beauty simple and divine? Remember how in that communion only, beholding beauty with the eye of the mind, he will be enabled to bring forth, not images of beauty, but realities (for he has hold not of an image but of a reality), and bringing forth and nourishing true virtue to become the friend of God and be immortal, if mortal man may.Would that be an ignoble life?”

-- Plato, Symposium

Sunday, April 28, 2024

SUFISM AND THE ORIGINS OF FREEMASONRY

 Below, excerpts from Idries Shah’s book “The Sufis”.







I read Masonic literature years ago. 

Like 17-18 years ago. 

I can’t figure out what he’s saying.

Does he mean “Bal”? As in “Baal”?






















The Square & Compass are Ancient Chinese symbols too.

Shah does refer to some sort of Taoist connection in some places.






















He devotes a whole chapter to the secret association of the Sufis with the Carbonari.




Doesn’t sound convincing to me.

There is something called “Black Magic” which is bloody, brutal, disgusting, involves terrible cruelty & infliction of pain, sexual perversions, mutilation & torture, and always has selfish, hurtful objectives.

I doubt if it has any specific relation to “Egypt”.



It maybe remembered by people interested in this stuff, that the “Baphomet” allegedly worshipped by the Templars was often thought to be a substitute for “Mahomet”.

Also: He means to say that the “Temple of Solomon of the Freemasons did not originally refer to the Temple built by the Jewish, Biblical King Solomon.

“Solomon” is a sort of euphemism for this person known as Kharki.

Why?

Because Maaruf Kharki was a “Son” – i.e. a discipline – of Daud of Tai.

Since the Biblical Solomon was the “Son of DavidKharki was called Solomon.

In which case this Maaruf Kharki has to be one of the most important human beings who ever lived!
























ROBERT GRAVES sums up the essential idea very succinctly:


He also gives an interesting little footnote:



Point is: Has anybody examined this idea ever since Shah wrote his book?

Idries Shah is quite well known.

How is it that nobody has tried to unearth the connection of the Sufis with Freemasonry, even if the connection is an older/extinct one?

Blavatsky does hint in Isis Unveiled that the Freemasonry which was revamped in 1717 was NOT the original Freemasonry.

But honestly, her work is so horribly muddled & so full of inane mystifications & unnecessary ramblings & painful incoherence, that WHAT she means becomes impossible to figure out.

How is it that nobody knows who is this Maaruf Kharki?

Or is he only incidentally important?

Is Idries Shah bluffing, or speaking half-truths, or is he simply correct?

Because, if he is, it would radically alter peoples’ understanding of not only the last 250 years of history, but also of several centuries before that.

This would mean the Sufis have played a very important role in the Revolutionary movements of the 18th & 19th centuries, and in Illuminism.

Indeed, he’s basically saying, throughout his book, that the Illuminists are Sufis.

I feel Shah often makes very tall claims – and I certainly can’t accept many of his ideas – but some are worth examining carefully.

I’m not aware if this has been done.

But there are some hints here & there, even in European literature, like the “fact” that the mythical founder of Rosicrucians, Christian Rosenkreutz, was initiated into the esoteric mysteries, in the East.

 

Keep in mind these passages from the Rosicrucian Manifesto, Fama Fraternitatis:

 

“Although the rude World herewith will be but little pleased, but rather smile and scoff thereat; also the Pride and Covetousness of the Learned is so great, it will not suffer them to agree together; but were they united, they might out of all those things which in this our Age God doth so richly bestow upon us, collect Librum Naturae, or a perfect Method of all Arts: but such is their opposition, that they still keep, and are loth to leave the old course, esteeming Porphiry, Aristotle, and Galen, yea and that which hath but a meer shew of learning, more then the clear and manifested Light and Truth; who if they were now living, with much joy would leave their erroneous Doctrines.

But here is too great weaknesses for such a great Work: And although in Theologie, Physic, and the Mathematic, the Truth doth oppose it self; nevertheless the old Enemy by his subtilty and craft doth shew himself in hindering every good purpose by his Instruments and contentious wavering people.

To such an intent of a general Reformation, the most godly and highly illuminated Father, our Brother, C.R. a German, the chief and original of our Fraternity, hath much and long time laboured, who by reason of his poverty (although descended of Noble Parents) in the fifth year of his age was placed in a Cloyster, where he had learned indifferently the Greek and Latin Tongues, who (upon his earnest desire and request) being yet in his growing years, was associated to a Brother, P.A.L. who had determined to go to the Holy Land.

Although this Brother dyed in Ciprus, and so never came to Jerusalem, yet our Brother C.R. did not return, but shipped himself over, and went to Damasco, minding from thence to go to Jerusalem; but by reason of the feebleness of his body he remained still there, and by his skill in Physick he obtained much favour with the Turks:

In the mean time he became by chance acquainted with the Wise men of Damasco in Arabia, and beheld what great Wonders they wrought, and how Nature was discovered unto them; hereby was that high and noble Spirit of Brother C.R. so stired up, that Jerusalem was not so much now in his mind as Damasco; also he could not bridle his desires any longer, but made a bargain with the Arabians, that they should carry him for a certain sum of money to Damasco; he was but of the age of sixteen years when he came thither, yet of a strong Dutch constitution; there the Wise received him (as he himself witnessseth) not as a stranger, but as one whom they had long expected, they called him by his name, and shewed him other secrets out of his Cloyster, whereat he could not but mightily wonder:

He learned there better the Arabian Tongue; so that the year following he translated the Book M. into good Latin, which he afterwards brought with him.

This is the place where he did learn his Physick, and his Mathematicks, whereof the World hath just cause to rejoyce, if there were more Love, and less Envy.

After three years he returned again with good consent, shipped himself over Sinus Arabicus into Egypt, where he remained not long, but only took better notice there of the Plants and Creatures; he sailed over the whole Mediterranean Sea for to come unto Fez, where the Arabians had directed him.

And it is a great shame unto us, that wise men, so far remote th'one from th'other, should not only be of one opinion, hating all contentious Writings, but also be so willing and ready under the seal of secrecy to impart their secrets to others.

Every year the Arabians and Affricans do send one to another, inquiring one of another out of their Arts, if happily they had found out some better things, or if Experience had weakened their Reasons.

Yearly there came something to light, whereby the Mathematica, Physic and Magic (for in those are they of Fez most skilful) were amended; as there is now adays in Germany no want of learned Men, Magicians, Cabalists, Physicians, and Philosophers, were there but more love and kindness among them, or that the most part of them would not keep their secrets close only to themselves.

At Fez he did get acquaintance with those which are commonly called the Elementary Inhabitants, who revealed unto him many of their secrets: As we Germans likewise might gather together many things, if there were the like unity, and desire of searching out of secrets amongst us.

Of these of Fez he often did confess, that their Magia was not altogether pure, and also that their Cabala was defiled with their Religion; but notwithstanding he knew how to make good use of the same, and found still more better grounds of his Faith, altogether agreeable with the Harmony of the whole World, and wonderfully impressed in all Periods of times, and thence proceedeth that fair Concord, that as in every several kernel is contained a whole good tree or fruit, so likewise is included in the little body of Man the whole great World, whose Religion, policy, health, members, nature, language, words and works, are agreeing, sympathizing, and in equal tune and melody with God, Heaven and Earth; and that which is dis-agreeing with them, is error, falsehood and of the Devil, who alone is the first, middle, and last cause of strife, blindness, and darkness in the World: Also, might one examine all and several persons upon the Earth, he should find that which is good and right, is always agreeing with it self; but all the rest is spotted with a thousand erroneous conceits.

After two years Brother R.C. departed the City Fez, and sailed with many costly things into Spain
(Idries Shah keeps referring to Spain as being under a very strong influence of the Sufis, Spain having been under Saracen rule for about 700 years), hoping well, he himself had so well and so profitably spent his time in his travel, that the learned in Europe would highly rejoyce with him, and begin to rule, and order all their Studies, according to those sound and sure Foundations.

He therefore conferred with the Learned in Spain, shewing unto them the Errors of our Arts, and how they might be corrected, and from whence they should gather the true Inditia of the Times to come, and wherein they ought to agree with those things that are past; also how the faults of the Church and the whole Philosopia Moralis was to be amended: He shewed them new Growths, new Fruits, and Beasts, which did concord with old Philosophy, and prescribed them new Axiomata, whereby all things might fully be restored:

But it was to them a laughing matter; and being a new thing unto them, they feared that their great Name should be lessened, if they should now again begin to learn and acknowledg their many years Errors, to which they were accustomed, and wherewith they had gained them enough: Who so loveth unquietness, let him be reformed.”


So basically, this means that Christian Rosencreutz was a Sufi.

At any rate, his received all his esoteric training in the Islamic-Sufic Middle East (with some Jewish influence, & also some Zoroastrian influence, if that’s what’s meant by the term “Magia”), in Turkey, Arabia, (this) Damasco, and Egypt.

This would mean, probably, that Rosicrucians were a Sufi sect operating in Europe.

It seems though, that the Sufic connection was lost after some time, though I find it very difficult to believe this theory: but of all that, sometime later, if and when time & circumstance permit.



















“Sigmund Freud,
Analyze this...
Analyze this...
Analyze this...this...this...this...
...
I’m gonna - break - the cycle
I’m gonna - shake up - the system...
I’m gonna destroy - my ego...
I’m gonna close my body now...
...
I think I'll find another way... 
I guess I’ll die another day
It’s not my time to go...”

“Die Another Day”, Madonna